Archives

--- Day changed Mon Nov 03 2014
10:01 -!- mode/#bcop [+o Tol_tootsie] by ops_logger
18:19 < ripe092> Sandy Murphy, Parsons. Question 1: There were reports of an ISOC project that would try to get confirmation of suspicious events in the routing system from the prefix holder - i.e., was it a hijack or benign. Did that project get going? Do you have results to share? It would be very interesting to hear. Question 2: The MANRS suggests using the IRRs to "information about routing policy, ASNs and prefixes" needed to build routing filters. The it
20:19 < ripe092> Sandy Murphy, Parsons. Question 1: ISOC announced the RRS ISOC project that would try to get confirmation of suspicious events in the routing system from the prefix holder. Did that project get participation? Do you have results to share? It would be very interesting to hear. Just knowing how many "events" were detected would be interesting.
20:19 < ripe092> Sandy Murphy, Parsons. Question 2: The MANRS suggests using the IRRs to "information about routing policy, ASNs and prefixes" needed to build routing filters. The it is the current best practice that we have. But there has been conversation, lately on the nanog list, about the lack of authorization of information stored in many IRRs. (RIPE is one of the few that *DOES* follow an authorization model.) It would be good to consider warning peopl
--- Day changed Tue Nov 04 2014